Importance of Uniformity - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 3 Words: 1013 Downloads: 4 Date added: 2017/09/17 Category Industry Essay Type Argumentative essay Tags: Job Essay Did you like this example? UNIFORMITY AND ITS INPORTANCE IN THE ARMY Uniforms help identify or tell us someone’s job or an organization they belong to. When you see a uniform it tells you something about the person wearing it. When you think about it, you see uniforms everyday. For example, doctors, police, chefs, and us soldiers. Uniforms can tell you that a person is there to help you. It makes them look different from other people so you can identify/recognize them more easily. Think of doctors, nurses, police, firemen and soldiers. A uniform, as opposed to a costume, is clothing of a certain type, style, and make up that is required by the organization the person belongs to. An Army uniform is actually described in Army regulations and Federal law allows military uniforms to be only worn by persons serving in the military. Uniforms tell you not only that a person belongs to a certain group but also that person has skills other people don’t. A police officer is only allowed to wear this uniform if he/she has completed specific training. A nurse is only allowed to wear this uniform if they have completed nursing school. You wouldn’t ask a police officer to stitch a cut on your arm and you wouldn’t ask a nurse to arrest someone. People in the armed services are different from other people. The army uniform tells you that the person wearing it belongs to a specific country and organization: The United States Army. This means the person wearing it has taken an oath to the government of the United States to defend the nation, even if it means they might get hurt or even die. The Army has two types of uniforms, one for dress and one for work. The Army work uniform is like a fireman’s uniform – it helps protect the wearer. The uniform provides protection for the wearer. It is a type of camouflage (because of the pattern) to protect the wearer from being seen. It tells you s/he is a member of the US Army. It tells you the personâ€⠄¢s name. It tells you the person’s rank. Twice, once on the flash on the beret and once on the jacket of the ACUs. (The higher the rank, the more people they can give orders to. )It tells you what part of the army he/she is in. This allows other people in the army to identify the wearer and be able to know where the person comes from and if they must take orders from this person. It allows the army to work smoothly. Uniforms are important in our society because it helps us identify the people who can help us if we get lost or hurt, protect us and keep us safe. Uniformity is a tool for the Army. It helps instill self discipline, attention to detail, and the ability to follow instructions for each soldier, and it provides leaders with an indicator of who among their soldiers actually is making an effort and who is just trying to do the minimum necessary to stay out of trouble. How crisp a uniform is pressed, how well boots are shined (when we had to shine them, the new b oots dont need it) placement of badges are all indicators of the effort someone puts in. Uniformity also helps ensure a comradery, and team environment. Everyone looks the same because they wear the same uniform. The only way for a soldier to separate themselves from the rest is either to exceed the standards, and encourage his teammates to do the same, or rock the boat, and hope he doesnt get thrown out. The Class A uniform is like a suit. It consists of the Army green coat and trousers, worn with either short-sleeve or long-sleeve green shade 428 shirt and a black necktie. This uniform is used for special occasions like graduations, promotion boards, promotions, and any special event put on by the military. This uniform may also be worn to civilian functions such as weddings, religious services, and the like. The Class B uniform omits the coat. The tie can also be omitted if the short-sleeve shirt is worn. The Class B uniform is what soldiers wear when they are not working in a field environment. Soldiers in the National Guard who serve part-time do not generally wear these uniforms, but you will need to know some information about them. The ACU uses a new military camouflage pattern called the Universal Camouflage Pattern (UCP), which blends green, tan, and gray to work effectively in desert, and urban environments. The ACU consists of a field jacket, trousers, headwear, a t-shirt, and footwear. The Army is about executing the mission, whether it’s unloading supplies at a warehouse in Texas, or going on patrol in Iraq. The ability to execute tasks is something that must be practiced. A similar example can be found in the NFL. In NFL minicamps the players are practicing techniques, and plays every day in order to ensure they can execute when game time comes around. Uniforms were made to provide a method to identify the soldiers. The uniform helped to identify friend from foe and to identify the type of soldier and his rank within his unit. Un iforms were standardized and each soldier became an element of a larger entity. It may seem silly to make a big deal about a badge not being 1/2 an inch from the top edge of a pocket, but after a while determining that 1/2 inch gap becomes second nature, and handy when the soldier is told to crimp the blasting cap 1/2 and inch from the end. no need to waste time and put life at risk by looking for a ruler in your pack. Uniforms also gave the soldiers a pride and taught them military discipline and bearing. A soldier had to be disciplined to learn how to clean his uniform, as well as his weapon. The uniform not only impressed his fellow soldiers but the enemy who he met in battle. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Importance of Uniformity" essay for you Create order

Marketing Communication Strategy Of Glasshouse Fragrance

Part A Introduction Glasshouse fragrance is a brand founded in 2006. The main business of the brand is selling the products of scented candles and diffusers. Nowadays, it is a successful Australia scented candle brand with a good market share in the local market. Part A will explore the reason why the brand quickly becomes a popular brand in the Australian market by analysing the communication strategies of the brand. At the same time, it will illustrate the problems of the communication strategy. Glasshouse fragrance is using the integrated marketing communication base on one core contention, which is building a conversation between the brand itself and the consumers to advertising the brand. There are three parts of the communication†¦show more content†¦In terms of the communication strategy of Glasshouse fragrance, the brand using the slogan: ELEVATING THE EVERYDAY as the core value of the self-construal. As the story of the brand on the official website, consumers not just burn a Glasshous e candles, they are starting a new experience, just like Alice in a sensory wonderland (Glasshousefragrances.com, 2017). In About the Symbolization of Alice s Adventures in Wonderland, the writer presents that, the book of Alice s Adventures in Wonderland creating a connection for readers between the book and personal motivation about wonderful adventure (Grotjahn, p.37). The brand using Alice’s symbol connect their product with the adventure about the scent. In other words, the brand could create a wonderful journey through scent for their consumers, at the same time, the consumers could also explore their own wonderland when they burn the candles of Glasshouse. To some extent, it is useful to using famous symbols link with the core value of the brand, especially through the official website of the brand. However, the core value of the brand is not represented completely, which means the brand construct is superficial not permeate the whole brand. They are expressing the value of brand through only one page

Hamlet Free Essays

The Fear of Death is what prompts us to action. Hamlet Ready to die in an effort to escape what he is feeling after his father dies but cannot, as it is ungodly. â€Å"Oh, that this too, too sullied flesh would melt, Thaw, and resolve itself into a dew, Or that the Everlasting had not fixed His canon against self- slaughter! O God, God! How weary, stale, flat, and unprofitable, Seem to me all the uses of this world! † (l. We will write a custom essay sample on Hamlet or any similar topic only for you Order Now i) This is Hamlets first soliloquy and our first look into Hamlet as character and we are immediately introduced to him as someone contemplating death and the value of his life. This is where we first see him as somebody looking to death as an escape from the pressures of his now seemingly dismayed life. He is in the strange position of both wishing for death and fearing what it will do to his soul. This dilemma prompts him to be more determined to find the culprit in his father’s death because he feels this will put his soul at peace. Hamlet is also mourning the eath of his late father and is so grieved by his father’s death that he wishes to die. Hamlet feels as if he is a defiled human being; (â€Å"O, that this too, too sullied flesh†) and he hopes that if he died he would become something less significant like dew, which will easily be absorbed by the ground. However, Hamlet knows that he cannot commit suicide because in the eyes of† the Everlasting† it is a sin; killing himself would make him even more defiled and block his entrance into heaven. This also elps to give us a first look at Hamlet’s morals. Moral dilemma as stated before is whether he should act on his feelings. He also is fearful of consequences that proceed his actions, actions he must take to put his soul at ease. Outside Commentary The critic has made many points in his essay, which I support and believe to be the correct interpretation of what Shakespeare was trying to put forth with the play hamlet. He states in his writing that it is Hamlets obsession with death that leads to Hamlet avenging the death of his father by killing Claudius. This most certainly true for had it not been on his fixation with whether he should die he would have not have had reason to seek an alternative to death when he first considered suicide. How to cite Hamlet, Papers Hamlet Free Essays string(76) " it is clear that diplomacy is something that the new leadership possesses\." English Thesis Paper A great number of lessons can be learned from Hamlet by Shakespeare. A very important lesson is that not everyone wants a leader, but every kingdom needs one. What is meant by this is that in a kingdom there will always be people who are not in favor of the person in charge. We will write a custom essay sample on Hamlet or any similar topic only for you Order Now However, in a functioning kingdom a strong leader is of essence. The arrival of Fortinbras in Act 5 Scene 2 of Hamlet is clear evidence that Shakespeare was in hopes of a noble leader replacing Elizabeth. Shakespeare believed that corruption was swarming in the state of England, and a noble leader was needed to replace her. Horatio makes it clear that conspicuous proceedings are going on in the state of Denmark. â€Å"In what particular thought to work I knew not, but in the gross and scope of my opinion, this bodes some strange eruption to our state† (Horatio-Act. 1 Scene 1- Lines 79-81). This was quite and deep quote that was made by Horatio. What Horatio was trying to say here was that something fishy was going on in his state, and that a change of the guard was needed. He was not quite sure what exactly was going on, but Horatio could sense that revolution was bound to take place. Our secondary source made it clear that there was rebellion sprouting in England. As it reads, â€Å"The seeds of rebellion sprouted in the North, far from London and the influence of the court, amid a rugged landscape dominated by magnates who clung to their old ways and resented royal intrusions† (What Life was like in the Realm of Elizabeth P. 47). This quote is supportive of Horatio’s assertion that conspicuous behavior was going on in the state. This quote makes it clear that there was resentment to the ruler in place, and that a people’s uprise was certainly on its way. In Hamlet it becomes clear that the state of Denmark was in for a rude awakening. In fact, it is said outright by a character in the play. â€Å"Something is rotten in the state of Denmark†(Marcellus- Act 1 Scene 4 line 100). This statement made it clear that Shakespeare, through other characters in the play, was hinting at the fact that there was need for change in the way that the kingdom was being run. This statement shows that Shakespeare clearly was voicing his own opinion through a character in his play. In our secondary source we found that â€Å"Poverty was rising and vagrancy with it†(What Life was like in the Realm of Elizabeth p. 8). Vagrants are individuals without regular income who travel from place to place and are seen as a threat to social order. The government was certainly not fond of these vagrants. The government considered most of these vagrants to be idlers who chose to be poor and lazy. This just adds pollution to the already clouded air of the k ingdom of England at the time. In addition to the corruption and the threat of rebellion, the people were getting poorer, and the government’s view of their people was becoming more and more pessimistic. The issues associated with Elizabeth were enhanced in 1568. Peace at home was shattered in 1568 with the arrival of Elizabeth’s Catholic cousin Mary Stuart, who had been forced to abdicate the Scottish throne† (What Life Was Like in the Realm of Elizabeth, p. 80). Elizabeth faced a great deal of turmoil with the arrival of her cousin. Elizabeth knew that there was a constituency of English Catholics who wanted Mary to be their ruler. In fact, Elizabeth felt so threatened by her cousin that Mary was sanctioned to house arrest. A rebellion by Mary’s supporters broke out, but it was quickly extinguished by Elizabeth’s troops. However, this made it quite clear that Elizabeth was not supported as the leader across the board. Shakespeare is emphasizing a kingly quality through the words of Hamlet. â€Å"Rightly to be great is not to stir without great argument, but greatly find quarrel in a straw when honors at the steak† (Hamlet Act 4 Scene 4 lines 52-54). Speaking through Hamlet, Shakespeare is showing that he believes that a ruler should know how to pick their battles. What Hamlet is saying is that a great ruler should not fight for an unworthy task, but should bring up a fight when honor at steak. This is an astute assertion by Hamlet, because a great ruler should have the discretion to know when it is right to take up conflict. Elizabeth was trying to extend her views beyond her reign. In fact, her successor was already decided upon. â€Å"Before she died, Elizabeth acknowledged as her successor Mary Stuart’s son, James, thus ensuring England would remain Protestant†(What Life was like in the Realm of Elizabeth p. 151). This likely perturbed Shakespeare. In Hamlet, Fortinbras’ arrival in the state of Denmark signals a change of the guard in terms of rule. The arrival of Fortinbras likely shows that Shakespeare wanted to see a change in the rule in the state of England. Diplomacy is another aspect of kingship that was brought up by Shakespeare. In Hamlet, towards the end, there was quite a bit of bloodshed amongst the people in the court. After Fortinbras arrived and claimed the throne, there was an issue of what to do with the dead bodies that were left. Horatio had quite a noble plan regarding what to do with the dead. â€Å"Speak loudly for him. Take up the bodies. Such as there becomes the field but here show much amiss. Go, bid the soldiers shoot† (Horatio, Act 5, Scene 2, Line 445). This quote expresses the belief that the court is no place for dead bodies, it is not a battlefield. This is also a sign of the morality in leadership that Shakespeare clearly is hoping for. Even after all of the dust had settled, and bodies were laying out, it is clear that diplomacy is something that the new leadership possesses. You read "Hamlet" in category "Essay examples" Our secondary source reinforces the idea that Shakespeare appreciated the aspect of building a nation the right way. â€Å"The strong association between nation-building and history writing was clearly appreciated by Shakespeare. The way that the crude matter of the past events, could be selected shaped and given meaning in a satisfying narrative, itself became the subject of drama†(The Sixteenth Century, p. 167). This shows that the future is often built upon what happened in the past. People can use the past to learn from mistakes and act in a more beneficial way the next time a situation arises. Although in Hamlet the past was clearly bleak, the new leadership is trying to use the past to learn what they should to in order to become a more successful nation. It is clear that Shakespeare was looking for Queen Elizabeth’s successor to be a person who could use the past to help improve the future of England. Another idea that became clear is that a person’s bad character becomes the contagion, and this contagion contaminates the entire kingdom. A kingdom that is ruled corruptly will undoubtedly fall victim to corruption itself. Hamlet provides insight into this idea. â€Å"The dream of evil doth all the nobles substance of a doubt to his own scandal† (Hamlet, Act 1, Scene 4, Lines 38-41). What Shakespeare was saying through Hamlet was that the character of a ruler transcends itself onto the character of the citizens. For example, when there is controversy based on the action of a leader, people in the kingdom will either support or disapprove of the leader’s actions. The people who support the ruler’s corrupt actions will, in turn, act in an evil and corrupt manner because they believe that the actions of their leader warrants this kind of behavior. We also found evidence of Queen Elizabeth having resentment towards the people who questioned her. According to our secondary source, â€Å"In the Privacy of her secret lodgings, she denounced those ‘wrongdoing subjects’ who challenged her judgment on marriage and succession†(The Sixteenth Century p. 173). This clearly gives evidence as to why Shakespeare was so disappointed with the rule of the state of England. This shows that Queen Elizabeth resented a good number of her citizens. A ruler who resents their subjects is asking for trouble. Once a ruler puts their stance over the stance of the people, it shows that the ruler is compromised. There was also evidence of a royal cover up that was orchestrated by Queen Elizabeth. In February 1587, the warrant for Mary’s execution was signed but Elizabeth ordered her secretary to show it to no one†¦.. justified their action as taken for [the queen’s] special service tending to the safety of her royal person. Elizabeth sought to hang Davison by royal prerogative for allowing the warrant to leave his possession†¦. judges pronounced this course of action imprudent and almost certainly illegal†(The Sixteenth Century p. 135). This is clear and decisive evidence that Queen Elizabeth was in the midst of some sort of royal cover up. It is curious that she did not want anybody to know about the hanging of Mary. The fact that she wanted a separate person hung for letting the warrant be publicized only reveals more about the cruelty that Queen Elizabeth was capable of. Queen Elizabeth’s underhanded actions only further explain why Shakespeare wrote about the need for a new more noble leader. Aside from the bad character of the ruler, it becomes clear that there is something brewing in the state of England, which is being covered up with lies and false perceptions. Polonius hints at this in Hamlet. Take this from this, if this be otherwise. If circumstances lead me, I will find where the truth is hid, through it were hid, indeed, within the center†(Polonius, Act 2 Scene 2 Lines 168-171). Through Polonius, Shakespeare is hinting at the fact that there is corruption somewhere within the state. In a noble manner, Polonius states that he will get to the bottom of whatever was happening, but he does not know what exactly is going on. Our secondary source also indicates that the government was looking to scapegoat people who may not have been involved in any scandal. According to our secondary source,† Gerard†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦reminded them that he had been examined time and time again, and they had not produced a single trustworthy witness to show that I had taken part in any activities against the government†(What Life was like in the Realm of Elizabeth, p. 103). This tells a great deal about the reign of Elizabeth. The government was so hell-bent on covering their actions that they resorted to scapegoating people who had done no wrong. Soon, Essex had had enough of the rule of Elizabeth. Essex could not tolerate such chastisement and soon hatched a plot against the queen and her advisers including Raleigh. Joining Essex were other disaffected aristocrats who had squandered their fortunes and hoped to profit†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (What Life was like in the Realm of Elizabeth, p. 150). This shows even further that Elizabeth was not a popular ruler. Many people, including Shakespeare wanted her gone. Any time a rebellion is struck it is a sign of dissatisfaction with the ruler. It is now clear that Elizabeth’s support was waning, and that a changing of the guard was in order. In a decaying world under the ruling of the state, change must take affect. Hamlet summarizes what is going on in the state of Denmark. â€Å"Tis an unweeded garden that grows to seed. Things rank and gross in nature possess it merely†(Hamlet Act 1 Scene 2 Lines 137-139). This is quite a bleak description of society. The weeds in this decaying world appear to symbolize evil and lies. The â€Å"things† that rank and gross in nature appear to represent humanity. The picture that Hamlet paints is of a society that contains citizens that seem to go about in their ordinary manner while evil and lies exist in society. Instead of trying to â€Å"weed out† the evil and lies, society carries on as if nothing is wrong. It also is indicated in one of our secondary sources that there was a great deal of begging and petty crime going on in the state of England. â€Å"Although the rogue pamphlets of the period described an organized hierarchy of criminal vagrants who frequently operated in the groups†¦There is little evidence of organized crime†¦Many of them on the road looking for work and willing to beg or resort to casual theft if no work was forthcoming†(The Sixteenth Century, p. 6). This clearly gives an indication of how the quality of life was decaying in the state of England in that time. With all the chaos that was going on around Elizabeth, nobody was paying attention to the people who were at the poorer end of the economic spectrum. Shakespeare was obviously annoyed at the fact that Elizabeth’s reign was causing a great deal of people to fall into peasantry. It is clear that change needed to take place. The arrival of Fortinbras indicates the end of a very troubling era in the kingdom of Denmark. Fortinbras realizes that he has inherited the kingdom. â€Å"With sorrow I embrace my fortune. I have some rights of memory in the kingdom, which now to claim my vantage doth invite me†(Fortinbras Act 5 Scene 2 Lines 407-409). Shakespeare, through Fortinbras, is accepting the new ruler of the state of England. In Hamlet, Fortinbras took over after a very unpopular ruling. Likewise, in the state of England, when King James I was accepted as the new ruler of the state of England it indicated a changing of the guard at the ruler’s position. The rule of King James I brought about a new philosophy in the kingdom. â€Å"With his execution in 1572, there were no more dukes in England until James I’s sentimental elevation of young Villars†(Elizabethan Renaissance, p. 120). The era of ruler’s appointing there people into office appeared to be over. Elizabeth’s kingdom fell similarly to Hamlet, and Fortinbras took over in a similar manner to King James I. An important lesson learned in Hamlet is that not everybody wants to be a leader, but every kingdom needs one. The arrival or Fortinbras demonstrates that Shakespeare was in hopes of a noble leader replacing Queen Elizabeth. The characters in Hamlet is representative of the kingdom of England at that time of Queen Elizabeth. Shakespeare hints at lies and conspiracies which the people were sublime to, and he knew that change was necessary in the ruling in order to save the kingdom of England. Shakespeare was a great philosophical writer who had a great talent with words. However, one may say that Shakespeare predicted the future of the state of England through the play of Hamlet. He showed that although not everybody wants to be a leader, every kingdom needs a leader. Works Cited Collinson, Patrick. The Sixteenth Century, 1485-1603. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2002. Print. Rowse, A. L. The Elizabethan Renaissance: The Life of the Society. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2000. Print. Shakespeare, William. The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. New York: Washington Square/Pocket, 1992. Print. Time Life Books, ed. What Life Was like in the Realm of Elizabeth: England, AD 1533-1603. Alexandria, VA: Time-Life, 1998. Print. How to cite Hamlet, Essay examples