Thursday, February 27, 2020

Assignment 3-2 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Assignment 3-2 - Essay Example This pattern emerges when we study the dominant traits of all the individuals in the group. Just as the personality profiles of individuals can be used to understand their interactions; the personality profiles of individuals and groups can also be studied to understand the extent of fit that the individual has with the group. Such analysis can often help us identify helpful and unhelpful patterns between levels in the hierarchy; co-workers, and thus help us repair the same to ensure efficient functioning of the group. In the present study, the group supervisor has a personality profile that can be coded as ESFP, and the group he supervises is coded has a dominant profile ESTJ. We find it important to study the interaction between these two profiles in order to try and understand the areas of strength and those of concern in the interactions of the supervisor and the group. The supervisor (personality profile ESFP) is a spontaneous, outgoing individual who loves attention and being a mongst people; interacting with them and helping them feel good about themselves. He makes a great team worker because of this. This person is also liable to be emotional in some situations, and moody in his interactions with others. He prefers using pre-existing structures to new ones; and is less likely to be analytical about the situation at hand. On the other hand, the group profile suggests that the group is organised and focused in its functioning and prefers to abide by rules and structures. It respects authority and is meticulous in its functioning. The discipline that the group seems to love keeps in on target in its goals, which also fuels its sense of purpose and confidence. The group does not take lightly to erratic and strange or out-of context behaviour. Its strong centrifugal style keeps the group connected and united in most cases. The relationship between these two groups is seen as one of Benefit; with the supervisor (personality profile ESFP) being the Benefactor of the group (personality profile ESTJ). A relationship of this kind gives the benefactor a more favourable place in the relationship; and thus, a higher place in the hierarchy. The relationship is mutually beneficial to the extent that the benefactor – here the supervisor – provides the presence and authority that the beneficiary needs and craves. This makes for a smooth work relationship in most cases, since the supervisor provides the authority and direction the team happily follows in the completion of the set goals. The supervisor in return gains respect from the team that provides a sense of authority and control the ESFP love. The team or group tend to identify with the supervisor and treats itself as an extension of this supervisor, such that the flow of command and direction is seamless and rarely challenged. There are potential areas of conflict also; since the supervisor does have some weak spots that the group tries to fill out. But being lower in the hiera rchy of power; they can only make suggestions that may or may not be conceded. This can lead to strife and angry interactions that taint the mood of the group; and could even affect it’s functioning. The supervisor’s personality does lead him to undervalue to inputs of the group; and may ignore suggestions from the team members. While they are focussed on maintaining the wellbeing and functionality of each team member; they do not feel the need to take all

Monday, February 10, 2020

Assignment 2 Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 4

2 - Assignment Example Good West Rubber Corporation, price designation of fair market value was definite enough to support an action for specific performance, since at the signing of the contract; both parties had agreed to use fair market value which would exist at the end of the lease. It is clear that Devine is an intended third party beneficiary of BIW-Dx contract, since according to the common law doctrine of privity of contract defines an intended third party beneficiary as the one whom the terms of contract and the circumstances surrounding the contract manifests intent to benefit. It is clear that Devine was to benefit from the BIW-Dx contract, since NorDx’s results was to determine his accessibility to obtaining a job with Bath Iron Works (BIW). According to Emerson (2009), employees whose job security and reputation have suffered as a result of false test results should be allowed to sue the drug testing labs for tort negligence, since in such situations, the drug-testing labs owe employees duty of care when conducting the tests. As part of this duty of care, it is within the drug-testing labs’ duty to handle employees’ samples and to produce the most accurate result on the